Back to Discussions
Bug Report

Published works may disappear (Don't disappear on your own!)

研研究者 Researcher
Translated to English·

I believe this has been reported several times so far.
When posted to the gallery, it is counted in the number of works and likes, but if for some unknown reason a published work disappears from the gallery, the number of works and likes also decreases. If I notice it, I can republish it from the generation history and restore it to the gallery, but if I don't notice, the data disappears within 30 days...
The cause is unknown, but timing-wise, it feels like it happens when a large number of works are processed as "unapproved" through manual review.

1

18 replies

や

Just guessing from the context, if it was visible after being posted but then disappeared, it probably means it didn't get caught by the "inappropriate filter" at the time of posting, but was later judged as "inappropriate" by the administrators and removed. Or maybe someone reported the image, and that report was accepted, leading to its deletion. On most sites, when content is removed by admins, you'd get a message like "this part violated the rules," or you might be warned that "repeated violations will lead to a ban." But this site doesn't have that (yet), so there's only speculation, which is frustrating. 🤔

研
研究者 ResearcherOP·

Thank you for your comment. Previously, if a post was deemed "inappropriate" after publication, it would be marked as "R15" or similar. If it were indicated that way, it would help us be more careful in future posts.

や
@研究者 Researcher

I haven't seen the R-15 tag much lately, so maybe the specifications have changed 🤔
Personally, I sometimes wonder if even already published works could later be placed under "unapproved"...
Side note, but the term "unapproved" feels a bit off too. Doesn't "unapproved" imply "pending approval"? "Disapproved" might be more accurate. It feels similar to how you'd say "sugar-free" instead of "sugar-unused" (just a side thought).

こ

Not only my posted works, but also generated videos are deleted without permission. Moreover, there is no explanation for the reason, nor any credit conversion. On sites like SeaArt, you can file an appeal, but on this site, you just have to silently endure it. This isn't just my experience—other users are saying the same thing.

研
研究者 ResearcherOP·

It's been deleted again. I'm sure there's a reason, but I'd appreciate a warning or notification.

C
Cylinder Chile·

:

ま
まれん2·

I definitely posted this image a few days ago, but
image
I can't find it in the gallery or on my profile. I thought maybe it failed moderation, but I checked and it's nowhere... Why...?

こ

I believe someone is manually deleting them. Not only the images, but the prompts are also being changed. Manually. Because of this, generation is abnormally slow. I don't know the reason, but I think it's almost certain. This comment may also be deleted.

S
SNoW·

Is this image generated around July 20th?
If so, it was probably rejected by AI's automatic review and didn't appear in the gallery.
Since the generation history is only stored for one month, the July entries have already disappeared from the history as of August 20th.

ま
まれん2·
@SNoW

Huh, was this blocked!? Are you serious?
I feel like I checked and it wasn't there, but maybe I was mistaken... 😇

K
Korea Space·

I see.

K
Korea Space·

I see.

C
Cedro Favrick·

I think logically they're making room on their servers, given the number of works generated. The same is true for AI music; I learned that the hard way.

S
SNoW·

When other users report a post, and after checking it, if we determine it is unsuitable for public viewing, we delete it immediately. The fact that no notification was sent at all was an issue on the site's side, so we will address it so that notifications are sent in the future.

J
ja·

are classified as unsuitable

香
香音·

I hope this site continues for a long time, so SNoW's intentions are important.

Leave a reply

Join the community to share your thoughts and ideas.

Sign in to join the discussion